Skip to main content
Confidential digital assets and private (permissioned) blockchains both keep business activity off the public record, but they make opposite trade-offs. A private chain achieves privacy by walling off the entire network — only approved participants can see or join it — which sacrifices the liquidity, reach, interoperability, and neutrality of public networks. Confidential digital assets keep settlement on public, EVM-compatible chains and instead encrypt the sensitive values, so activity is private while the asset still lives on open infrastructure.

​
Two ways to get privacy

  • Private chain: move to a separate, permissioned network. Privacy comes from restricting who is on the network. You give up public liquidity and interoperability, and you take on the cost of running or trusting a closed network.
  • Confidential asset: stay on a public chain, but encrypt balances and amounts and prove validity with zero-knowledge proofs. Privacy comes from what is visible, not from who is allowed in.

​
Side-by-side comparison

​
When each makes sense

Private chains can suit fully closed consortia that never need public-chain liquidity or external counterparties. But for most enterprise use — treasury, stablecoins, B2B settlement, tokenized assets — the goal is the reach and settlement guarantees of public chains without the exposure. Confidential digital assets deliver that combination; private chains force a choice between privacy and reach.

​
FAQ

Private chains sacrifice the reach, liquidity, and interoperability of public networks. Confidential digital assets keep public-chain settlement while making activity private and disclosable by policy.
Balances and amounts are encrypted and counterparties are not exposed, so the sensitive data is protected. What you keep is the public chain’s liquidity, neutrality, and reach.